New user? Register here:
Email Address:
Password:
Retype Password:
First Name:
Last Name:
Existing user? Login here:
 
 
Letters to the editor >

The Lambeth Commission’s report: how it will play

From Mr Geoff Sage
Sir, — I refer to your report on the work of the Lambeth Commission ( News, 17 September). The comments from the Church of England Evangelical Council (CEEC) and Anglican Mainstream do give cause for concern as we await this important document. Their rush to judgement betrays an arrogance that undermines the serious and difficult work that the Commission has undertaken. Is this their strategy?

I find the comment from the Ven. Paul Gardiner most perplexing. Your reporter quotes him: "We [the CEEC] want to see the Eames report upholding traditional biblical and orthodox understandings of behaviour and the place of holiness in Christian life. We will judge all things by scripture."

It is interesting to hear of an Evangelical who wants to uphold the traditional and the orthodox. Thank goodness his predecessors didn’t heed this in the 18th century, when they led the fight against slavery. The CEEC appoints itself as the judge of scripture. By what right does it take on this role?

Anglican Mainstream also sees itself as the champion of the orthodox. If we are all trying, however inadequately, to be followers of Jesus Christ, where precisely in the Gospels and in his teachings do they find the exhortation to seek the traditional and the orthodox?

Perhaps they read a different version from mine, with all the unsettling and challenging parts safely bowdlerised.

GEOFF SAGE
Greystones
Easter Moffat
Plains, Airdrie
North Lanarkshire ML6 8NP

From Mr Michael Hampson
Sir, — I am delighted to read that many people will accept the Lambeth report "only if it passes the test of scripture".

I propose three scriptural tests that it must pass if it is to be deemed properly Christian. Matthew 7.1 requires that the report should not involve anybody’s presuming to sit in judgement on anybody else. Hebrews 8.13 and Romans 7.6 require that there should be no dependence whatsoever on Old Testament law. Matthew 22.37-39 requires that the report should be characterised exclusively by compassion.

It is time, as Bishop Gene Robinson has said, to reclaim the Bible from its misrepresentation by those who have taken it hostage and claimed for themselves the exclusive right to speak on its behalf.

MICHAEL HAMPSON
26 Hanover Avenue
London E16 1SD

From Dr Alan Sheard
Sir, — Mr Richard Wilkins ( Letters, 17 September) regards the Pentateuch as "opposed to extramarital affairs". He seems to be unaware of Genesis 16, which says, with apparent approval, that Abraham had a child by his wife’s maidservant Hagar; and chapter 28, which records that Esau chose for a wife Mahalath, daughter of Ishmael, "in addition to the wives he had".

I am not condoning extramarital affairs or polygamy, but merely pointing out that Mr Wilkins’s letter is an example of the casual sophistry and misuse of the Bible which are all that the critics of lesbian and gay people have to offer.

ALAN SHEARD
7 Northfield
Swanland
North Ferriby
East Yorkshire HU14 3RG

 

Top feature

Ebola virus: ‘impact is still real’

Ebola virus: ‘impact is still real’

Sierra Leone is officially free of the Ebola virus, but the devastation caused by the disease has left lasting scars. Molly Hodson visited the country to see how it is coping  Subscribe to read more

Top comment

It's both hands together

Christianity needs political visibility on both Left and Right if it is to remain untainted by partisan associations, says Nick Spencer  Subscribe to read more

Tue 26 Jul 16 @ 17:18
RT @ShaunJClarksonJust been searching the (free access in July) @ChurchTimes archive for "Goole" Fascinating to see what's changed in 150 years & what hasn't

Tue 26 Jul 16 @ 14:23
NEW: Terrorist attackers murder elderly priest in Rouen https://t.co/uysXhf0L6B