New user? Register here:
Email Address:
Password:
Retype Password:
First Name:
Last Name:
Existing user? Login here:
 
 
News >

Four bishops sign a declaration opposing the new terrorism Bill

THE BISHOPS of Coventry, St Edmundsbury & Ipswich, Oxford, and Worcester have signed a declaration that strongly opposes the Government's Prevention of Terrorism Bill, which is currently going through Parliament.

They joined hundreds of others, including lawyers, actors, playwrights, and trade-union leaders, to protest about the new Bill, which gained a narrow majority of 14 after its Third Reading in the House of Commons on Monday.

The most keenly debated part of the Bill is the proposal to introduce "control orders", which would include house arrest, as well curfews, tagging, and bans on phone and internet use.

The Bill gained its majority on Monday night after the Home Secretary, Charles Clarke, introduced a last-minute amendment, which said that the control orders leading to house arrest would be imposed by judges, not politicians.

But the human-rights organisation Liberty, which has organised the declaration against the Bill, said it was "deeply concerned by the unending restrictions on liberty".

A spokeswoman for the Bishop of Worcester, Dr Peter Selby, said it was something he felt very strongly about. In a debate in the Lords on Tuesday, Dr Selby said: "I am most of all concerned that this Bill does not become what it currently has every sign of becoming: a victory for the terrorists. . . There are other dangers posed by terrorists, and they are extremely serious. I do not minimise them. There is something altogether different, however, when the state begins to turn on its people, or awards itself the power to do so."

The Bishop of Coventry, the Rt Revd Colin Bennetts; the Bishop of St Edmundsbury & Ipswich, the Rt Revd Richard Lewis; and the Bishop of Oxford, the Rt Revd Richard Harries, all said on Tuesday that they felt strongly about the issue. All four bishops said that they had responded individually rather than speaking on behalf of the Church of England.

A spokesman for Liberty said on Tuesday: "Secret evidence delivered is not the same as a fair trial."

During Tuesday's debate, peers put forward a "sunset clause", which would mean the law would reach the statute book, but remain there only until 30 November 2005. The Bill was due to be debated again in the Lords yesterday.

www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk

Job of the week

Priest / Entrepreneur

North East

DIOCESE OF DURHAM We are currently looking to fill the following vacancy. Please visit us online and on twitter for details. Come and help us focus our energies on Church growth. Priest / Entre...  Read More

Signup for job alerts
Top feature

We need to talk about God

Immortal, invisible: the doctrine of God

David Bentley Hart tackles the limitations of language in defining the infinite and indefinable  Subscribe to read more

Question of the week
Should funding for ordinands be age-related?

To prevent multiple voting, we now ask readers to be logged in. This is free, quick and easy, honestly. Click here to login or register

Top comment

Called, collared, and confident in co-working

The Church needs a more flexible approach to vocation and training for ministry, says Andrew Watson  Subscribe to read more

Fri 12 Feb 16 @ 21:30
Japan's great 2011 disaster remembered https://t.co/gnbxt7tPlD https://t.co/mUc5Isz2Hd

Fri 12 Feb 16 @ 21:00
Helen House hospice founder: 'It is hard to accept that your name will never be cleared' https://t.co/F8z4EnaNEq https://t.co/m2Ulspf4iI