In praise of a little literary ability
Posted: 02 Nov 2006 @ 00:00
THE CLASSIC list of the qualities needed for success in journalism includes
"rat-like cunning". I've forgotten the other two, but that doesn't matter,
because there is a fourth: a very short-term memory. Nothing destroys the
excitement of a news story so much as a sense of perspective; nothing makes for
worse journalism than a reporter self-consciously writing history; and nothing
dates more quickly either.
It came, then, as a salutary shock the other day, when I was reading Dorothy
L. Sayers's book on the Trinity, to find her denunciation of the media from
1941, and to realise just how old are the habits of mind we attribute to the
She wrote: "Some time ago, the present writer, pardonably irritated by a
very prevalent ignorance concerning the essentials of Christian doctrine,
published a brief article in which those essentials were plainly set down in
words that a child could understand. Every clause was preceded by some such
phrase as: 'the Church maintains', 'the Church teaches', 'if the Church is
right', and so forth. The only personal opinion expressed was that, though the
doctrine might be false, it could not very well be called dull.
"Every newspaper that reviewed this article accepted it without question as
a profession of faith - some (Heaven knows why) called it 'a courageous
profession of faith', as though professing Christians in this country were
liable to instant persecution. One review, syndicated throughout the Empire,
called it 'a personal confession of faith by a woman who feels sure she is
What looks dated here are some of the phrases - "the present writer",
"throughout the Empire" - but what is actually dated is that she does not blame
the papers for this. The fault, she thinks, lies as as much with their readers:
"Ninety-nine 'interviews' out of a hundred contain more or less subtle
distortions of the answers given to questions, the questions being, moreover,
in many cases, wrongly conceived for the purpose of eliciting the truth.
"The distortions are not confined to distortions of opinion but are
frequently also distortions of fact, and not merely stupid misunderstandings at
that, but deliberate falsifications. The journalist is, indeed, not interested
in the facts. For this he is to some extent excusable, seeing that, even if he
published the facts, his public would inevitably distort them in the reading."
There speaks a woman who earned her living in an advertising agency. But she
is right, of course.
THIS MAKES it easier to appreciate those occasions on which a journalist
gets things more or less right, like Robert Chesshyre's piece in the
Telegraph magazine's Christmas Eve issue on "inner-city vicars".
He picked three very different people in differently horrible places, and
followed them around for a while. Not for long enough, I would have said,
perhaps unfairly, since the piece showed signs of fairly drastic cutting. I
could have done with much more. What was left concentrated, however, on the
work of a priest, and even had one who was a man. (I know, but whenever these
stories are proposed, editors want women in them, simply because they believe
that women are what women like to read about.)
Mr Chesshyre is not, he says, himself a churchgoer, but he is deeply
impressed by the mere presence of priests in places where no one else is found,
and by the specifically parochial aspects of the system. "I reported from a
gang-infested south London estate, where at night the elderly cowered behind
their doors; where the postman had long ceased delivering; where the dairy
employed an armour-plated milk float.
"They are places that almost no one who could choose where to live would
select as home. The one exception is often the Church of England vicar. . . In
these areas the vicar's influence reaches far beyond the usually tiny Sunday
congregations. While many faith leaders take responsibility just for their own,
a vicar's writ extends uniquely to all who live within the parish."
Certainly, much of the witness of the people he talks with consists in being
burgled and threatened alongside their flocks. The eager young public
schoolboy, converted, so to say, when he took part in a Youth for Christ
mission to Wolverhampton, now has a congregation of 20 in an estate on the edge
of Nottingham. His biggest crowd came at the funeral of a local gangster, when
he preached on the penitent thief crucified alongside Jesus.
It's difficult to imagine a less glamorous parish. His parishioners are not
even exotically poor, nor black. But the presence of the Church of England in
such places, though it makes no financial or managerial sense at all, is the
one thing that earns it real credit in the outside world.