New user? Register here:
Email Address:
Password:
Retype Password:
First Name:
Last Name:
Existing user? Login here:
 
 
Comment >

Giles Fraser: Exposing the flaws of choice


A study from the University of London, which was published this week, says that Down-syndrome pregnancies have risen by 70 per cent. This is put down to women having babies later in life, when the chances of a Down-syndrome con­cep­tion are higher. But the study also says that fewer children are being born with the condition, as its abortion rate is now 92 per cent. Some apparent expert on the Today programme justified all of this under that lazy catch-all alibi: choice.

It is the choice of modern women to try for babies later in life because this fits in better with their desire for a career earlier in life. So the number of abortions rises steadily. Abortion is a by-product of a lifestyle choice. But because it is a largely hidden one — the sadness of abortion taking place privately and discreetly — the full cost of this demographic shift in women’s behaviour and expectations is rarely weighed. It is out of sight and out of mind — and thus so much easier to wave away with a casual flick of the word “choice”.

But the Today-programme expert is not alone in using the word as she did. It is the single most over-used, and misused, get-out-of-jail-free card in contemporary moral jargon. So let’s take it slowly. Choice is good, in so far as a free society is better than an unfree one. That moral principle is in the bank, for me.

None the less, just because some­thing is a choice does not make it morally right. I might choose to stab the Dean of St Paul’s, but my choos­ing to do so makes no differ­ence to the morality of the act. This is so ob­vious that it ought not to need saying.

Yet the way that many public figures segue from the importance of having choice to a blanket affirm­a­tion of the moral rightness of any and every choice made, by anybody in any conceivable circumstances, is absurd, and deeply corrosive of the moral fibre of society. I feel a bit of an idiot having to point this out. But if Grandma can’t suck eggs, she needs to be shown how.

More than 1100 Down-syndrome babies were aborted in 2007-08, compared with 300 in 1989-90. Those of us who think this a significant moral issue are often treated like religious fundamentalists who want to put women in shackles and push them into the hands of grubby back-street abortionists.

Rubbish: what most of us want to see is an end to our culture’s damaging obsession with physical perfection, something driven by our own fear of inadequacy. The false logic of choice which blocks any challenge to this cult of perfection is profoundly harmful to us all.

The Revd Dr Giles Fraser is Canon Chancellor of St Paul’s Cathedral and Director of the St Paul’s Institute.

Job of the week

Priest / Entrepreneur

North East

DIOCESE OF DURHAM We are currently looking to fill the following vacancy. Please visit us online and on twitter for details. Come and help us focus our energies on Church growth. Priest / Entre...  Read More

Signup for job alerts
Top feature

We need to talk about God

Immortal, invisible: the doctrine of God

David Bentley Hart tackles the limitations of language in defining the infinite and indefinable  Subscribe to read more

Question of the week
Should funding for ordinands be age-related?

To prevent multiple voting, we now ask readers to be logged in. This is free, quick and easy, honestly. Click here to login or register

Top comment

Called, collared, and confident in co-working

The Church needs a more flexible approach to vocation and training for ministry, says Andrew Watson  Subscribe to read more

Fri 12 Feb 16 @ 19:00
“If warfare is the sole tool we use then [it] will become utterly wrong & we will fail.” https://t.co/OKy7HoYDGj https://t.co/4pNRxfiNQO

Fri 12 Feb 16 @ 18:00
Incense filled Hampton Court Palace chapel as Latin solemn vespers was sung on Tuesday https://t.co/iWnq1WDMdO https://t.co/rszsp37lkL