British False Memory Society’s letter

24 March 2010


From Lucy Huntington

Sir, — As a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, and as a committed Christian who is anxious to see the Church taking a more positive approach to helping survivors, I was horrified to see the British False Memory Society (BFMS) given press coverage (News, 19 March).

Your report did not purport to support the views of the BFMS, but by quoting extensively from their letter to the Archbishop of Canter­bury gave a possibly assumed validity to the society’s views.

My memories of my extremely traumatic abuse are all recovered memories and, therefore, open to question concerning whether they are true. All I can say is that none of them were recovered when I was in therapy; that I am the person it has been hardest to convince of their truth; and that nobody, given the choice, would choose to recover such memories.

There is now a large amount of scientific evidence to show how the brain responds to trauma. That memory of trauma can indeed be hidden for many years.

The BFMS stance is incredibly damaging to any survivor struggling to come to terms with, and heal from, his or her abuse. It also provides a useful excuse for families when they are unable to face the truth that a perpetrator is a family member.

Cumberland Court
Church Street, Wye
Ashford Kent TN25 5BJ

Church Times: about us

Latest Cartoon

Job of the Week


The Church Times Podcast

Interviews and news analysis from the Church Times team. Listen to this week’s episode online

Subscribe now to get full access

To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read up to twelve articles for free. (You will need to register.)