THOUGH the 18th century produced many fine portrait-painters, there is
little religious art from that period which appeals to us today. All this began
to change at the end of the 18th century and in the early part of the 19th,
with what came to be called the Romantic Movement.
Like all artistic categories, the Romantic Movement has blurred edges, but
artists of this time shared a reaction against what they thought of as the
shallow rationalism of the Enlightenment. They wanted to go, as they felt,
deeper into the nature of things. Eighteenth-century painters had sought the
sublime in nature, but, to the Romantics, their picturesque scenes had no hint
of “inner goings-on”, as Coleridge put it. Romantic artists looked for
“something far more deeply interfused”.
The result is that Romantic landscapes often have a strongly religious
quality to them. Constable, for example, was a religious person who sought to
respond to the truth of the divine in landscape. He and others transferred to
landscape something of the Protestant attitude to God.
Sometimes these landscapes are manifestly symbolic, as those depicted by
Caspar David Friedrich (1774-1840), which have an ambivalent, hallucinatory
quality. Though they are full of symbols, their power does not rest simply in
the symbols, but in the “strong intense polarity of closeness and distance,
precise detail and sublime aura”.
Not surprisingly, the Romantic Movement has been termed “spilt religion”,
and the second part of a major book on Caspar David Friedrich is entitled “Art
as Religion”. These works from the Romantic Movement reveal a sense of the
solitariness of the artist and the isolation of the viewer (or listener), an
isolation related to the sundering of bonds of community by a rapidly
industrialising society. The artist’s life, his subjectivity, his feelings all
come strongly to the fore.
One of Caspar David Friedrich’s most famous works,
Cross in the Mountains, was commissioned as an altarpiece. Its fir
trees and cross silhouetted against the sky evoke a sense of a lonely soul
reaching out to the infinite. The rays of light shining out from behind the
mountain and the colour of the sky indicate new hope, fresh start,
The less well-known work Morning in the Riesengebirge (reproduced,
right), painted in 1810, has the same effect in a less obvious way. Most people
love mountains, and, for many, mountains have an awesome, religious quality.
Even without the cross in this picture, the mountain range, bare and austere in
the forefront and misty in the background, would evoke a strange admixture of
feelings of closeness and distance, longing and satisfaction.
The slim silhouette of the cross, with a tiny figure leaning against it, is
not alien to this landscape. On the contrary, it focuses its religious appeal
in Christian terms. The infinite for which humans long, evoked by such
landscapes, is nothing less than the beauty of love given to the uttermost.
The God who gives us the rocks gives us his crucified Son. And both draw us
out of ourselves to wonder and worship.
Questions for reflection
What landscapes particularly evoke your religious feelings? What do these
Is Caspar David Friedrich right to see an affinity between what landscapes
can evoke and the central symbols of our faith, especially the cross?
This is an edited extract from The Passion in Art by
Richard Harries (Ashgate; 0-7546-5011-1)
To order this book email details to