back back to June 2008

Faithbook: new Facebook page to help religions get along

03/06/2008 18:00:00


'Pages' on the Facebook social networking website are similar to Facebook groups but designed for businesses, brands, musicians and public figures rather than members of the public. Pages have 'fans' rather than 'members' and there are a few other not terribly interesting differences.

A new page, entitled 'Faithbook' has been set up for fans of interfaith dialogue. It is apparently "the only faith group on Facebook to invite all faiths to participate". The page, set up by the Movement for Reform Judaism, includes contributions from representatives of nine different faiths on subjects such as 'Countering extremism through the use of new media' and 'Spreading the message of the faith through new technology'. Canon Michael Ipgrave, Archdeacon of Southwark represents Christianity in these discussions.

Facebook  © not advert

Riazatt Butt first mentioned Faithbook this morning in the Guardian - there have since been reports in the Times, Telegraph, ITN and on blog posts by Ruth Gledhill and George Pitcher (whose blog is also named 'Faithbook' - see below). Simon Barrow of Ekklesia managed to accidentally feature in Joanna Sugden's Times report by posting 'is this it then?' on the page, an understandable sentiment given that at the time only one other person had posted on 'the wall'. He comments here.

Like Simon I wasn't too impressed when I first had a look this morning. But having read a bit more I can see how this could be a useful endeavour. Its success will depend on the way it is maintained and moderated. It is very easy to set up new internet ventures, but far more difficult to sustain them successfully in the long run.

Besides this new Faithbook page and George Pitcher's Faithbook blog, the name is also used by the Washington Post Faithbook student blog, the Faithbook social networking site by Faithaction and another Faithbook social networking site by a 'Fellowship of World Christians, Working Together in Union with Christ'. Whether any of these entities will demand exclusive use of the name or whether they will all coexist in a state of peaceful dialogue and harmony remains to be seen.


A good, sane perspective (as usual), Dave. I'm pretty sure that Faithbook is not the only page on Facebook to invite all faiths to participate, however, though from the point of view of some kind of 'official sanction' it is. Likewise, my inclusion in The Times piece wasn't exactly an accident - but a result of the 24/7 news phenomenon known as "how can I get a fresh angle out of this story?"

Simon Barrow | 04/06/2008 08:56:15

Thanks Simon. I aim to be good and sane.

By 'accidentally feature' I think I meant that you hadn't set out to make an 'official' comment.

Dave | 04/06/2008 09:33:39

Firstly, the name "Faithbook" is appalling. If anyone was to say, "I'm on Faithbook", it would just sound like they had a lisp.

Secondly, it says: "Spreading the message of the faith" - THE faith? If it's multi-faith, then surely it's just the message of "faith"? And that (as many have endeavoured to point out to Prince Charles) is a non-starter, since all the faiths involved have very different and contradictory messages. It does sound ominously like the dreadful "Sea of Faith" Network.

BIGDAN | 04/06/2008 09:33:59




back back to June 2008 up back to top


© Church Times 2006 - All rights reserved

Website by Baigent