Church Times blog

About the blog | Subscribe using the blog RSS feed | See an explanatory cartoon | Twitter
The three latest entries from the Church Times Blog Twitter feed:

The latest (5.15pm) from General Synod meeting in York: Synod has voted against the amendment proposed by the Archbishops of Canterbury and York that would have allowed for “co-ordinate jurisdiction” for those opposed to women bishops.

The vote was narrowly lost in the House of Clergy. The numbers:

Bishops: 25 for 15 against 0 abstain
Clergy: 85 for 90 against 5 abstain
Laity: 106 for 86 against 4 abstain

As a whole, more Synod members were in favour - 216 to 191.

For background see this week's Church Times: Women-bishops amendments before Synod run to 37 pages

Ruth Gledhill has posted a video from the Synod chamber: Archbishop of York speaks at General Synod

Summaries of Synod business so far can be found via the CofE media centre.

10/07/2010 17:15:00 | 1 comment | Email a friend


General Synod is meeting over this weekend in York. Some useful resources:


From this week's Church Times, two pieces on the major debate on women in the episcopate: Women-bishops amendments before Synod run to 37 pages

Justin Brett has posted his own guide: The Dodgy Liberal: A Lesson concerning the Debating of Women Bishops.

The agenda and link to the live feed can be accessed by this page on the C of E site.

You can follow what is being said on Twitter (often from the chamber) via the #synod hashtag.

Useful blogs include Thinking Anglicans and the General Synod blog.

For in-depth coverage see the Church Times next Friday, or subscribe to the General Synod Digest (01603 785910 or jenny (at) hymnsam.co.uk ).

09/07/2010 18:00:00 | 1 comment | Email a friend

Jeffrey John will not, apparently, be the next Bishop of Southwark. The latest 'leak' was posted last night on the Telegraph website and on Jonathan Wynne-Jones' blog.

The focus on a number of blogs has been the damage done by the reporting of this story.

Nick Baines: Media literacy lesson 1:

The point of this ramble is to encourage a closer questioning of what we are being fed. The words matter. Journalists might want to tell a story and raise temperatures – that is fine, that is their job. But the readers should engage brains and not take seriously this sort of language without seriously questioning it first. This isn’t knocking journalists – I am more interested in how the readers read rather than how the writers write.

Pete Broadbent writing in the comments of the Church Mouse blog:

It suits the drama merchants of the media to make this a matter of one person being accepted or rejected. The prosaic truth is that there will have been several plausible candidates discussed. In other words, they hyped the story up but they did it out of ignorant mischief-making.

Colin Coward, writing on the Changing Attitude blog, doesn't hold back in expressing his frustration:

Conservative Evangelicals are ruthless in their determination to win total control of the church, even if in the process, they destroy the Church of England’s ability to communicate the gospel to the nation, and destroy the unity of the Anglican Communion, by whatever unprincipled, destructive means possible.

08/07/2010 10:00:00 | 2 comments | Email a friend

The appointment of the next Bishop of Southwark has made the news over the weekend. From Jonathan Wynne Jones on Telegraph.co.uk: Gay cleric in line to become bishop in Church of England and Meeting on appointment of gay bishop will determine future of the Church.

Some caution must be exercised - the last time around a number of papers were more or less certain that Jeffrey John was to become the Bishop of Bangor, and it turned out not to be the case.

The BBC Today programme hosted a 7 minute discussion between Canon Chris Sugden and Dr Giles Fraser on the subject. You can listen here: 'No chance' gay bishop will split CofE

Anglican Mainstream has issued an Urgent Call for Prayer

See also the Daily Mail: New row set to split Church of England as Cameron pledges support for openly gay cleric

A reminder of events in 2003/4 when Jeffrey John was proposed as a potential Bishop of Reading. From the Church Times at the time:

05/07/2010 10:30:00 | 2 comments | Email a friend

The Archbishops of Canterbury and York have released the text of their suggested amendment to the women-bishops legislation, to be debated in the General Synod next weekend. The purpose, as announced in their statement last week (News, 25 June), is to provide traditionalists with a bishop whose authority is not delegated by the diocesan bishop, while, at the same time, stating that such provision does not diminish the diocesan bishop’s jurisdiction over the whole of his or her diocese in any way. The text of the amendment is here:

DRAFT BISHOPS AND PRIESTS (CONSECRATION AND ORDINATION OF WOMEN) MEASURE

Draft amendments to omit reference to delegation

Co-ordinate Jurisdiction

Clause 2

1. In subsection (1) leave out the words "way of delegation to".

2. After subsection (1) insert –

"(2) The episcopal ministry referred to in subsections (1), (3) and (5) shall be exercisable by virtue of this section and shall not divest the bishop of the diocese of any of his or her functions.

Clause 5

In section 5(1)(b), at the end, insert the words "and, in particular, arrangements for co-ordinating the exercise of episcopal ministry under section 2(1), (3) and (5) by the bishop of the diocese and any other bishop who exercises episcopal ministry in accordance with those subsections".

+Rowan Cantuar +Sentamu Ebor


Thinking Anglicans usefully shows how this is to be worked into the text of the original draft Measure.

See also our Leader from June 25: Archbishops’ plan: can it save the day?

01/07/2010 12:30:00 | No comments | Email a friend

mitregate  © not advert
The Presiding Bishop of the US Episcopal Church, Dr Katharine Jefferts Schori, carried her mitre when she visited Southwark Cath­edral. London SE1 community website

An interesting e-mail has been posted on the Episcpal Cafe Lead blog: Lambeth Palace on "the issue of vesture" AKA #mitregate. The message was received by an American Episcopalian who had written to the Archbishop of Canterbury unhappy about the "manner in which our Presiding Bishop, Katharine Jefferts Schori, was treated during her recent visit to Southwark Cathedral". The 'mitregate' (as it has become known) incident was covered in last week's Church Times (scroll down the page).

The e-mail from Lambeth Palace helps to explain their position, so I imagine they are happy for it to be circulated:


Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 1:14 PM
Subject: RE: [ID: 81888] AB Comment from an American Episcopalian

Dear Mr _____,

Thank you for your e-mail to which I have been asked to respond as, I am sure you will understand, Archbishop Rowan is not able to reply personally to as much of the correspondence he receives as he would wish. It may help if I set out some of the background to the questions you raise.

The Dean of Southwark first issued an invitation to Presiding Bishop Jefferts Schori before the Lambeth Conference in 2008 – one in what I understand to be an ongoing programme of invitations to Primates of the Anglican Communion. She was not able to accept the invitation at that time and last Sunday’s date was subsequently agreed. Initially the invitation was to preach, however, earlier this month it became clear that the Presiding Bishop would be asked to preside at the Eucharist too. As the intention was for her to 'officiate' at a service the Archbishop’s permission was required under the provisions of the Overseas and Other Clergy (Ministry and Ordination) Measure 1967. This is a matter of English law. The Archbishop’s permission under the Measure is the means of confirming a person’s eligibility to exercise their ministry in the Church of England and applies to any clergy ordained overseas. The application form (an example of which is at www.cofe.anglican.org/about/churchlawlegis/faq/appform.rtf) asks the necessary questions - although in the Presiding Bishop's case it was explicit that the 'letters of orders' were not required. The Archbishop's permission was sought and granted, although the legal and canonical framework of the Church of England prevents the Archbishops granting permission for a woman priest to exercise a sacramental ministry other than as a priest. The agreed approach of the English bishops is that women bishops celebrating under these provisions should do so without the insignia of episcopal office so as to avoid possible misunderstandings.

As you might imagine, I am not in a position to answer the questions about what permissions or evidence of orders the Episcopal Church require of clergy from other parts of the Anglican Communion.

Please be assured that the Archbishop, and those of us who support his ministry, had no intention to slight the Presiding Bishop. Indeed, by ensuring that the legal formalities were observed it was hoped that she, and the Dean of Southwark, might be spared the embarrassment that might have flowed from any challenge to her presiding and preaching at the cathedral. The media interest provoked over the issue of vesture has, of course, undermined that hope - as your letter makes clear.

Yours in Christ,

Anthony Ball
Sent by Jack Target on behalf of:
The Revd Canon Anthony Ball
The Archbishop of Canterbury's Chaplain
Lambeth Palace, London


For more see tomorrow's Church Times.

[Thanks to the London SE1 community website for the use of the image.]

24/06/2010 07:30:00 | 4 comments | Email a friend

A new sitcom based on the life of a Church of England vicar starts next week on BBC 2. The BBC website describes Rev as a 'sitcom about a vicar running a modern inner-city church, with a reluctant wife and a depleted, motley congregation'.

Writer and actor Tom Hollander talks about the series in an interview in the Scotsman:


Hollander goes to church from time to time, but describes his own faith as "wishy-washy". He hopes Rev might prompt some viewers to rethink their attitude to organised religion. "This series in no way takes the mick or indicts the church," he says. "In a very modest way, it is pro the church and pro this vicar. I emerged from this show with a great deal of respect for vicars. They put up with a lot and do really good work for people having a bad time.

"Clearly, our ambition is not to fill churches – and nor would we stand any chance of doing that. But if Rev makes people think, 'maybe I'll poke my head inside the local church and see if something nice happens', that would be great."


Read the full interview in the Scotsman: Interview: Tom Hollander, actor

See also:

- British Comedy Guide: Rev
- Guardian: Olivia Colman in Rev
- TV.com: Video interview with Tom Hollander

Rev: Monday, 22:00 on BBC Two (England, Scotland, Wales only).


Update: David Keen has found a trailer, whilst the Church Mouse deserves some credit for spotting the announcement of this series last year.

Further update: Rev is featured in this week's Church Times, out on Friday.

22/06/2010 16:20:00 | 1 comment | Email a friend

From the Church of England: Bishops highlight unchanging duty to share the Good News

The Church of England’s long history of witnessing to the unique significance of Jesus Christ is a duty that continues in today’s multi-faith environment, reiterates a new report.

Following a debate in February 2009, the General Synod asked the House of Bishops to produce a report on “their understanding of the uniqueness of Christ in Britain’s multi-faith society [and to include] examples and commendations of good practice in sharing the gospel of salvation through Christ alone with people of other faiths and of none”. A small group led by the Bishop of Willesden, the Rt Revd Pete Broadbent; the Bishop of Southwell and Nottingham, the Rt Revd Paul Butler; and the Bishop of Birmingham’s Adviser on Inter Faith Relations, the Revd Dr Toby Howarth, drafted the document, which was subsequently commended by the House of Bishops at its recent meeting.

The report affirms that missionary activity has always been a hallmark of the English Church’s life, whatever the country’s social and political context, and should continue to be so.

While acknowledging the “shadow side” of some historic evangelistic endeavours, the report’s foreword notes that: “…the fear of getting it wrong should never obscure the Christian’s commitment to the good of all and to making Christ the centrepiece of that good. Too much reticence is as untrue to our history and our vocation as too much stridency.”

The document draws on case studies from across the country, including Leicester and Bradford, where dioceses and parishes are actively engaged in inter-faith dialogue by expressing a “sensitive confidence” about the Christian faith. The report suggests that the experience of initiatives such as these is that there is a real desire among people of other faiths to hear about the beliefs which motivate Christian action and witness.

Within this context, the report urges caution about the language of ‘market choice’ when used in the context of religious belief. The foreword summarises this idea with the reminder that “it is not we who bring others to Christ but God working in them”, suggesting that “when our encounters with our neighbours, of other faiths and none, are distinguished from exercises in salesmanship, we can be confident that we are sharing God’s love rather than marketing another lifestyle choice.”


A news story on the original 'uniqueness of Christ' debate was published in the Church Times in February 2009: UNIQUENESS OF CHRIST: Bishops asked for help in pressing Christian claims

21/06/2010 13:25:00 | No comments | Email a friend

UpdateChurch Times story: Archbishops take a hand in women-bishops debate

Friday's Church Times press column (subscriber only) mentioned a Guardian Diary column which suggested that the Archbishops of Canterbury and York were to intervene in the forthcoming General Synod debate on women bishops. This morning details of the Archbishops' amendment has been made available. From General Synod Draft Legislation: Women in the Episcopate:

The Archbishops of Canterbury and York have signalled their intention to propose jointly in due course an amendment to the draft legislation to enable women to become bishops in the Church of England due to be debated at General Synod in July.

Their proposal is, in summary, for 'co-ordinate' jurisdiction, whereby a diocesan bishop (male or female) would in refrain from exercising certain of his or her functions in parishes with 'requested arrangements'. A 'nominated bishop' would exercise those functions in the parish in question.

You can read the full note on the amendment here.

Jonathan Petre has written a piece in the Daily Mail: Archbishops risk 'bloodbath' over women priests by letting opponents of reform remain in the clergy

The Archbishops want the Church legislation radically amended so that opponents are fully protected in law. They are, however, running the risk that the liberal-dominated Synod, which is made up of nearly 500 bishops, clergy and lay people, will reject the proposals, leaving their authority in tatters.

An insider said: ‘This is a huge moment for the Church. It will determine the shape of things to come. The Archbishops are putting their integrity on the line, but are passionate about keeping the Church together.’

However, a leading supporter of female clergy said: ‘There is a good chance the Synod will reject the Archbishops.’


Forward in Faith have released a short statement: FiF reacts to Archbishops' Statement

Forward in Faith warmly welcomes today’s Statement from the Archbishops of Canterbury and York and now looks forward with great interest to seeing the precise texts of the amendments to the Draft Measure which they will propose to the General Synod next month.

The CofE has published details of the July Synod agenda in a press release this morning: Full agenda published for July General Synod sessions at York University

Peter Owen has posted links to a wide range of individual Synod papers on Thinking Anglicans.

21/06/2010 10:50:00 | 1 comment | Email a friend

The Scottish Episcopal Church General Synod begins today.

There is a press release outlining the main agenda items on the Scottish Episcopal Church site, which includes this brief statement from the Primus, the Most Rev David Chillingworth:

“The business before us over the next few days will give us plenty of opportunity to talk about the life of our church, our society and our place in God’s creation. We shall visit questions about what it means to be fully human – for example in the Gender Audit.  The Anglican Covenant arises from the stresses and strains in our life around the issues of human sexuality – the continuing questions about what it means to be human and about the nature of God himself.  But it also leads us to ask how we can continue to express a common faith in Christ – to recognize one another as disciples – within the rich diversity of the life of our church and of the Anglican Communion.”

“It will be a great pleasure to receive the Most Rev Katharine Jefferts Schori.  We greet her as the Primate of one of the Provinces of the Anglican Communion - one with which the Scottish Episcopal Church has close historical links.”


You can follow the proceedings on Twitter via the hashtag #pisky, along with official updates from the Scottish Episcopal Church Twitter account.

10/06/2010 10:30:00 | 1 comment | Email a friend



Church Times is not reponsible for external content



© Church Times 2006 - All rights reserved

Website by Baigent