New user? Register here:
Email Address:
Password:
Retype Password:
First Name:
Last Name:
Existing user? Login here:
 
 
Book reviews >

The Nature And Limits Of Human Understanding: The 2001 Gifford lectures at the University of Glasgow

Book title: The Nature And Limits Of Human Understanding: The 2001 Gifford lectures at the University of Glasgow
Author: A. J. Sanford, editor

Publisher: T & T Clark
Church Times Bookshop £45 & £18 respectively


SOMEONE once turned up to Alan Ecclestone’s parish meeting with the query, “Is this the place where they like arguments?” This book will appeal to people who like arguments, at least, in the more philosophical sense of that word. For the 2001 Gifford lectures, five different lecturers gave two lectures each on the topic of human understanding. Half-way through, a round-table discussion was held, of which, unfortunately, this book contains no record. The contributions are extremely diverse, and only one is from a theologian. The other contributors include three very diverse philosophers, and a psychologist. The latter, P. N. Johnson-Laird, entertainingly sets out many logical puzzles to illustrate the limitations of our understanding which, he argues, centre on our inability to construct correct models of causal relations. George Lakoff argues that neuroscience has transformed our understanding of all the age-long philosophical puzzles. His argument for fully embodied mind is absolutely congenial to anyone who believes in incarnation, though it sets puzzles for the doctrine of God (something theologians have realised at least since Origen). Non-specialists like myself are bound to treat with scepticism the claim that one or two philosophers have discovered the key to everything. Michael Ruse argues for an altruistic version of social Darwinism, arguing that evolution equips us for social co-operation. This means, I suppose, that the architects of the Washington consensus are atavisms, something I have suspected for some time. Lynne Rudder Baker, the only philosophical theologian among this group, argues for the priority of first-person knowledge, which means, among other things, that the knowledge claims of natural science are incomplete. She offers a sophisticated justification for taking reasons of the heart seriously. I have to confess that I turned to Brian Hebblethwaite with a sense of relief, even though his two chapters read rather like a literature review. He is generous and eirenic, but cumulatively makes a powerful case for the contribution of theology to human understanding, above all by the persistent exploration of difficult questions, which is how the late Herbert McCabe understood Aquinas’s Five Ways. The book would have been stronger if Hebblethwaite, a defender of theology as “Queen of the sciences”, had tried to respond to the four previous lecturers. As it is, it will appeal to interested enquirers, happy to have the problem of understanding discussed from a variety of angles. The Revd Dr Tim Gorringe is Professor of Theological Studies at the University of Exeter. To place an order for this book contact CT Bookshop
Job of the week

Priest in Charge

South East

Diocese of Chelmsford is currently looking to fill the following posts Priest-in-charge, St Mary, Prittlewell This ancient parish, in Southend-on-Sea is looking for a priest in the Liberal-Cathol...  Read More

Signup for job alerts
Top feature

Called on to build a new kind of bridge

Called on to build a new kind of bridge

Two days after her consecration in York, Gavin Drake meets the new Bishop of Stockport  Subscribe to read more

Question of the week
Is a fundamentalist approach to religion always wrong?

To prevent multiple voting, we now ask readers to be logged in. This is free, quick and easy, honestly. Click here to login or register

Top comment

Dissing the D-word

Angela Tilby: Discipleship as a convenient term to ramp up the commitment of the laity sounds alien to Anglican instincts, and it is. I hope Synod members are gearing up for creative revolt  Read More

Fri 30 Jan 15 @ 16:35
RT @waltonandyGreat to read stories of Syrian refugees in @churchtimes in their own words rather than just seeing them as stats. http://t.co/xdFEljbATR

Fri 30 Jan 15 @ 16:25
.@stephensizer has now apologised for his 9/11 link on social media http://t.co/kFW9Cp6H9p