New user? Register here:
Email Address:
Password:
Retype Password:
First Name:
Last Name:
Existing user? Login here:
 
 
Comment >

Fair trade is not for wimps

*
THE Financial Times called the Archbishop of Canterbury’s sermon for the 60th anniversary of Christian Aid (News, 29 April) a “comic cliché”. His crime, apparently, was not to have been enthusiastic enough about the benefits of free trade and liberal economic theory. Instead, he did what “leftish” clerics are wont to do: “wringing his hands about social problems”.

What total rubbish. What I heard in that sermon was Dr Williams accepting the basic principle that trade is the engine of wealth creation, and arguing that “universal trade liberalisation may offer fresh markets and promise overall increases of wealth”.

Notwithstanding the qualification “may”, even the Globalization Institute, whose attack on fair trade was the point of departure for Dr Williams’s consideration of trade justice, welcomed the sermon. “I’m delighted that the Church of England is starting to recognise that the debate is more complex than first imagined, and this sermon is an encouraging step,” said its president, Alex Singleton.

What Dr Williams rightly complained about was that many in the West talk about free trade, but are unprepared to deal with its real consequences, even in their own businesses. “The rich protect their markets while talking about the virtues of free trade,” he said.

Only last week, the World Trade Organisation (WTO) confirmed that EU sugar exports were illegal. After complaints by a number of poorer sugar-producing countries, the WTO has found that Europe has been dumping millions of tonnes of subsidised sugar on the global market, thus depressing the world price. No wonder poorer countries are unable to compete. If there is a moral responsibility for our new Government, it is surely that we must increase market access for poorer countries.

Even so, Dr Williams was recognising that freeing trade comes at a cost. After the WTO ruling, the sugar producers Tate & Lyle saw their share price fall by 15.5p. That’s a measure of the cost for the West — a cost we continue to try to avoid paying. For a developing country, and specifically for individuals and families with no state social security to fall back on, the cost is often devastating — as it can be for the environment, too.

Despite its capacity for overall wealth creation, when the lives of many vulnerable people are at stake, the unquestioning adherence to free trade is a dangerous extremism. To suggest that an acknowledgement of this social cost is limp-wristed Anglicanism is a cheap shot, unworthy of the FT.

The Revd Dr Giles Fraser is Team Rector of Putney.
Press


 

Job of the week

Priest in Charge

Wales

Esgobeath Bangor The Diocese of Bangor Eglwys sy'n Dysgu A Learning Church The Bishop of Bangor wishes to appoint a Priest in Charge of Conwy & Gyffin and Ministry Area Leader Designate Th...  Read More

Signup for job alerts
Top feature

Counting the cost

Counting the cost

Huw Spanner hears tips for people who are interested in banking, investing, and saving more ethically, but who are unsure where to start  Subscribe to read more

Question of the week
Should the UK take in more refugees fleeing Islamic State's terrorists?

To prevent multiple voting, we now ask readers to be logged in. This is free, quick and easy, honestly. Click here to login or register

Top comment

Looking for new funds? Pass the ice-bucket

As charities seek to attract a new generation of donors, they are having to find more targeted methods, reports Nick Jowett  Subscribe to read more

Mon 20 Oct 14 @ 17:04
Welby: 'Bankers need to pursue the sort of heroism praised by Aristotle and Virgil' http://t.co/gBzgfOe7nW

Mon 20 Oct 14 @ 14:33
The women-bishops Measure will be discussed in House of Commons this pm. Here's what was said in House of Lords: http://t.co/vUpcrnNlRq