New user? Register here:
Email Address:
Password:
Retype Password:
First Name:
Last Name:
Existing user? Login here:
 
 
Comment >

Giles Fraser: Covenant theology for everyone

Many of us have buried our heads about all this Anglican Evangelical covenant stuff (News, 22 December). For Anglicans, unlike Christians of the Reformed traditions, covenantal theology is not something they are familiar with, and I suspect most of us wish it would go away. I worry that somewhere in the dungeons of Lambeth or Abuja, a set of theological manacles is being bashed out. But the ostrich attitude won’t help. It’s time to engage: so here’s my primer.

Throughout the Hebrew scriptures, God makes pacts with the Jewish people, granting them security, law, prosperity, and the land of Israel. God’s covenant with Abraham was signed with circumcision. He made others with Noah, Moses, and David. But Jeremiah (31.31) hinted at a new agreement — an agreement written into hearts.

Christians have read this new testament (the word covenant being translated testamentum in the Latin Bible) as having to do with the person and teachings of Jesus. Two references are significant. The first is in the Gospel accounts of the Last Supper, and is the beating heart of the eucharistic prayer: “This is my blood of the new covenant which is shed for you.”

The other is where Paul, explaining the new covenant, writes: “For you are all children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been baptised into Christ have put on Christ.” Then comes that famous bit: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female; you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3.26-29). The Bishop of Durham, Dr Tom Wright — basically, Mr Covenant as far the present crisis is concerned — gets it spot on: “All those who believe in Jesus belong at the same table.”

Yet there are those for whom this new testament is not enough. They want a new new testament, creating a sub-division within the category “all those who believe in Jesus”. They want to write a new new testament that will distinguish first- and second-class Christians. And the sign of this unbiblical covenant is to be sound doctrine, as defined by a small coterie of conservative Evangelicals.

The temptations to produce a new new testament are familiar. Joseph Smith set out to restore original Christianity. He believed he had discovered a new new testament written on gold tablets. Thus he founded Mormonism.

Well, I don’t want a new new testament. I’m a baptised believer who wants to gather round the table with others. Open table fellowship was a hallmark of Jesus’s ministry. Anything more restrictive is an insult to orthodoxy.

The Revd Dr Giles Fraser is Team Rector of Putney, and lecturer in philosophy at Wadham College, Oxford.

Job of the week

Canon Precentor

Wales

ST ASAPH CATHEDRAL THE DIOCESE OF ST ASAPH CANON PRECENTOR The Bishop of St Asaph, in conjunction with The Dean and Chapter of the Cathedral, wish to appoint an experienced priest to minister ...  Read More

Signup for job alerts
Top feature

A man in tune with his times

A man in tune with his times

Ian Ramsey was an 'improbable' Bishop of Durham. On the centenary of his birth, John Saxbee recalls a philosopher of religion who was also a man of the people  Subscribe to read more

Question of the week
Is a fundamentalist approach to religion always wrong?

To prevent multiple voting, we now ask readers to be logged in. This is free, quick and easy, honestly. Click here to login or register

Top comment

The challenges that the new C of E reports duck

Linda Woodhead finds the proposed remedies for the numerical decline of the Church too clerical and too congregational  Read More

Thu 29 Jan 15 @ 16:15
The @churchtimes is looking for a new part-time features editor. Details http://t.co/X6vIshebKe. Deadline Monday 2/2/15 Please RT

Thu 29 Jan 15 @ 15:30
Tomorrow's issue features an interview with Libby Lane. Subscribe at http://t.co/3ZIw4HO5wz. Prices from just £22.50! http://t.co/64KfOQ8w1v