back back to News previous previous story  |  next story next

Chi-rho cross may be fake, say experts

by Bill Bowder


Doubtful provenance: Lord Carey wearing his replica of the chi-rho amulet, worn at his enthronement

A SMALL ancient cross, thought to be one of the earliest signs of Chris­tian civilisation in England, is almost certainly a hoax.

The silver cross, bearing the letters chi-rho — the first two letters of Christ’s name in Greek — was dis­covered in 1990 in a fourth-century grave by the Fosse Way in Shepton Mallet, Somerset.

A copy of the cross had been presented to Lord Carey, who was then Bishop of Bath & Wells. He wore it at his enthronement as Archbishop of Canterbury in 1991.

Last week, the results of tests carried out by Dr Matthew Ponting, from the University of Liverpool, suggested that the silver used to make the cross was of 19th-century origin.

The artefact was found next to one of the skeletons, but there was speculation that a hoaxer may have placed it there to delay a proposed warehouse development on the site by Showerings, the makers of Baby­cham.

The Revd Elizabeth Smith, Rector of St Peter and St Paul, in Shepton Mallet, said on Monday that the coun­ty historian had already told her he was unsure of its authenticity. “But it is still amazing that the Ro­man settlement was there, because be­fore that we did not know it existed.”

Prebendary John Woolmer, her prede­cessor at Shepton Mallet, said on Tuesday that the Roman bones had been reburied “in an ecumenical service with the Roman Catholics. There were around 30 skeletons, and I said the Lord’s Prayer in Latin, which I thought they would under­stand.”

The archaeologist who found the amulet, Quentin Hutchinson, denies taking part in a hoax, and remains convinced that the find is genuine. He says that when he found the cross, embedded in the soil, it had been a “once-in-a-lifetime moment”. But the doubts that were subse­quent­ly cast on his integrity, and the suspicion that he had planted the cross, had caused to him to resign from his profession, he told The Times.

“The real problem,” he says, “is that the amulet is unique. Because it doesn’t fit their understanding of the period, they are determined to believe that it cannot be genuine.” He now wishes he had never found it because, he says, “it ruined my life.”

The amulet remains at the county museum in Taunton, which is closed for refurbishment, reopening in 2010.

  © not advert



back back to News up back to top previous previous story  |  next story next


© Church Times 2006 - All rights reserved

Website by Baigent