back back to Letters previous previous story  |  next story next

Anglican Catholics and the legacy of the 1970s

From the Revd Maggie Guillebaud
Sir, — Is it not time that Canon Simon Killwick (Letters, 25 July) and others who profess that their Catholicism is being denied to them as a result of Synod’s decision on the code of practice regarding women bishops, and those who would deny homosexuals their place in the Church, came clean? Would not “Roman Catholicism” be a more honest sobriquet?

True Catholicism means a universal Church that embraces all humanity. Christ hung on the cross for all of us. When he encouraged us to go out in the highways and byways to bring all manner of men and women to feast at his table, he did not ask us to question their sexual orientation before issuing an invitation.

It is possible to be both Catholic, in its true sense, and liberal. Affirming Catholicism has been both for 18 years.

MAGGIE GUILLEBAUD
Convener of Affirming Catholicism,
Salisbury diocese
The Dovecote, Mount Sorrel
Broad Chalke
Salisbury SP5 5HQ

From the Revd John Grover
Sir, — Back in the early 1970s, the General Synod made the decision that there was no theological objection to the ordination of women. All people who have been ordained since that date will have known that the Church in which they felt called to minister was going to accept women as priests and deacons, and inevitably as bishops, too. How is it that they now find such actions unacceptable?

I notice that both the Bishops of Richborough and Ebbsfleet (Letters, 25 July) were ordained well after the decision about the acceptability of women’s ordination. Did they not know what kind of Church they belonged to? Were they not told that they would be working alongside women in the Church?

It seems unlikely that those who trained them in theological college were unaware of the change that had taken place, or perhaps they were simply naïve or blind to what had happened. At any rate, it seems that those ordained after the original decision in the 1970s don’t have a leg to stand on in the present debate.

JOHN GROVER
5 The Stables
Buccleuch Chase
St Boswells TD6 0HE

From the Revd Andrew Wakefield
Sir, — Having trained at King’s, London, in the 1970s, I would place myself within the liberal tradition of the Church of England. I am at a loss to see how those of other traditions are able to describe the Church of England as taken over by a liberal agenda.

Recent conversation with clergy friends who trained alongside me shows that many of us believe that the progress of the Church in so many areas of our common life from the 1940s through the 1980s has been slowed in the past few years, and, if anything, started to go in reverse.

ANDREW D. WAKEFIELD
105 Hartfield Road
London SW19 3TJ



back back to Letters up back to top previous previous story  |  next story next


© Church Times 2006 - All rights reserved

Website by Baigent