Contents
- Home
- News
- Question of the week
- Comment
- Letters
- Is Fairtrade fair? The Adam Smith Institute’s criticism of the movement
- Baptism: guidance needed, not officiousness
- Responses to the Lent series on the laity’s duties
- The Church takes the National Lottery’s shilling
- A disappointing Christian Resources Exhibition
- Decline in the villages: before the post office, the parsonage . . .
- Sensitivity to the hard of hearing needed, too
- Employment rights for church organists: a welcome breakthrough
- Requirements of foster-parents, and of bishops
- Real Life
- Features
- Faith
- Humour and crossword
- Pastimes
- Books
- Arts
- Media
- Gazette
back to Letters |
previous story
|
next story
|
Responses to the Lent series on the laity’s duties
From the Rt Revd Michael Doe MICHAEL DOE General Secretary USPG: Anglicans in World Mission 200 Great Dover Street London SE1 4YB From Mr Richard C. H. Mercer Sir, — The Revd Dr Cally Hammond, in her article for your series on the spiritual discipline of the laity (Faith, 15 February), reflects on regularity of church attendance. She asks how many Christians go to church more than once on a Sunday, and mentions those with “multiple jobs” to do, “and, of course, the exhausted country clergy tearing round six churches in a day”. I have been a Reader in the Hereford diocese for more than 25 years, and, on one occasion, had to take four services on a summer Sunday. It is not unusual for me to look after two. The norm is one. At our annual meeting in the autumn, the diocesan, the Rt Revd Anthony Priddis, in thanking his Readers for their contribution said that, without the Reader ministry in his diocese, the work of the Church would be severely handicapped. We are not seeking praise or further thanks — just recognition. RICHARD MERCER Tana Leas Farm, Clee St Margaret Craven Arms, Shropshire SY6 9DZ |
back to Letters |
back to top |
previous story
|
next story
|


.gif)
